Evidence-first cyber governance for regulated service firms
Client Login

Borealis Programs

Governance programs built for the review that is coming

Every carrier renewal, audit, diligence request, and procurement review asks the same thing: proof that your security program is real, current, and defensible. Borealis runs that program so you never have to rebuild from scratch.

Choose the context you operate in. Each program follows the same operating model: one owner, one maintained evidence set, and a clean export the moment someone asks.

The program pages below spell out the advisory-versus-managed scope in public so teams can self-qualify before booking.

Book a 30‑Minute Program Review Compare Advisory vs Managed
PROGRAM FIT

What changes by page

  • The reviewer language and likely evidence requests
  • The calendar pressure and cadence Borealis should protect
  • The state or framework requirements you need to explain
  • The evidence the reviewer expects to see
  • The public scope split between advisory and managed delivery

Independent Insurance Agencies

Built for carrier renewals, DOI exams, and diligence where the story needs to hold up under pressure.

NAIC and state-specific requirements with evidence built for carrier renewals and DOI exams.

Tax & Accounting Firms

Built around FTC Safeguards, peak-season reality, and client diligence that cannot disrupt the work calendar.

One governance cadence that stays calm before busy season and exports cleanly during review season.

Accounting & Advisory Firms

Built for firms balancing FTC baseline obligations with procurement, privacy, and wealth-client diligence.

One maintained program that answers multiple reviewer contexts without duplicate work.

Advisory vs Managed Model

Compare a lightly guided in-house track against the managed Borealis cadence that keeps the whole program moving.

Useful when leadership needs clarity on ownership, meeting load, and who chases the evidence.

Aurora Command

The same operating system under every Borealis program

We do not change systems for each vertical. Borealis runs the same proof discipline in Aurora Command, then adapts the cadence and evidence to the reviewer asking the question.

Aurora Command screenshot showing control-to-framework mapping with evidence counts and freshness indicators. Governance + reuse Mapped once Evidence-linked Freshness visible

Governance Mapping

Map one control set to every reviewer context

Aurora Command keeps control coverage, evidence counts, and framework mapping in one working view instead of across spreadsheets.

  • Control-level mapping stays tied to evidence.
  • Framework overlap does not create duplicate work.
  • Stale items are visible before a reviewer notices.
Aurora Command screenshot showing a framework library with multiple mapped frameworks and requirement counts. Reusable proof Versioned frameworks Mapped requirements

Framework Library

Add frameworks without rebuilding your evidence set

Aurora Command treats frameworks as reusable structures around one maintained control library, so the same program can answer different reviewer contexts.

  • Useful when firms face overlapping regulator, buyer, and partner reviews.
  • Supports a single operating cadence across multiple proof obligations.
  • Makes state and industry requirements easier to explain.
Aurora Command screenshot showing evidence freshness timing, approvals, and current versus expiring status indicators. Monthly cadence Approval trail Current / expiring / stale

Freshness + Timing

Keep evidence current between review cycles

Aurora Command surfaces freshness timing, approval history, and review status so Borealis can run a calm monthly cadence instead of a last-minute scramble.

  • Good evidence has an owner, a date, and a refresh cadence.
  • Review cycles stop depending on memory and inbox searches.
  • Borealis uses this to keep the program organized for review year-round.
Aurora Command Trust Center access screen showing access-code entry and request-access form. Controlled sharing Access request workflow Believable reviewer handoff

Trust Center Access

Share proof through a controlled handoff

Aurora Command uses controlled access workflows instead of loose attachments, so buyers and reviewers get the right evidence without losing track of what was shared.

  • Cross-domain handoffs feel deliberate instead of abrupt.
  • Useful when procurement or diligence reviewers need selective access.
  • Supports a controlled proof handoff without email chaos.
Tour Aurora Command Book a Program Review

Real Aurora Command screenshots from the live public Aurora surface.

One delivery model, three buyer contexts

The program structure stays steady. The reason buyers care changes. Borealis matches the story, artifacts, and final export to that context.

Insurance

  • Carrier questionnaires and renewals
  • State insurance cybersecurity requirements
  • M&A and agency diligence

Tax & accounting

  • FTC Safeguards and QI expectations
  • Tax-season blackout planning
  • Client security questionnaires

Advisory

  • Procurement and wealth-client diligence
  • State privacy and breach requirements
  • Valuation and buyer confidence